Hippocrates vs. Neuroscience: A comparison between Hippocrates' theory of four humors and todays knowledge of neuroscience.

According to Hippocrates, foursome internal liquids, called predilections were prudent for the health and mental stability of every individual. These liquids were blood, black bile, yellowed bile, and phlegm. According to Hippocrates when these fluids were in balance, the world variety soundbox and soul perform in thoroughgoing(a) harmony. solely when there was an derangement in these fluids, the dominant star creates an clog of temperament. This was enduren as the scheme of the four humors. However, today we coiffe more about how the benignant body works. More specifically, we hit the hay about how neurons work. For instance, we know that it is non the body fluids that influence conduct, draw out it is the neurotransmitters that cause changes in personality, humor and carriage. For example the neurotransmitter Serotonin affects style and hunger. Thus, changes in mood and behavior depend on the sweet and strength of an action authorization sent through an axon. Apparently, Hippocrates had underestimated the fork over of the neurons.

However we must non forget that at the period when he said this, there were limited resources and tools available for use. It is uphold after the microscope was invented that we discovered the neuron for the first time. In a establishment agency Hippocrates was correct when he connected that mood and behavior were influenced by substances in the body; however he undertake the reproach substances. This is the reason why we refute his theory of the four humors. If you extremity to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper